Selective Annotation of Modal Readings: Delving into the Difficult Data

Lori Moon, Patricija Kirvaitis, Noreen Madden

Abstract


 This work presents an alternative approach to the question of how to define taxonomic categories in the word sense disambiguation problem of determining the reading of a modal auxiliary verb. We focus, in this paper, on uses of could, which we found to be the most difficult of all of the modal auxiliary data. Rather than classifying uses of could according to taxonomic labels such as ability  or deontic, we classify uses with respect to where the reading situates the eventuality being described relative to the speech time. For example, the sentence ‘You could swim.’  is about a swimming eventuality in the past leading up to the time of speech, if it is read as being an ability. The sentence is about a swimming eventuality in the future of the time of speech, if it is read as being a polite suggestion. We classify the uses according to specific temporal properties of the eventuality that the modal auxiliary describes. We achieve between 0.614 kappa  and 0.769 kappa inter-annotator agreement. The temporally-inspired categories we propose have immediate relevance for models of modal auxiliary meaning and provide the groundwork for improved classification into finer-grained, inference-rich semantic categories.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abusch, Dorit. 1997. Sequence of Tense and Temporal De Re. Linguistics and Philosophy 20(1):1–50.

Baker, Kathryn, Michael Bloodgood, Bonnie J. Dorr, Chris Callison-Burch, NathanielW. Filardo, Christine Piatko, Lori Levin, and Scott Miller. 2012. Use of modality and negation in semantically-informed syntactic machine

translation. Computational Linguistics 38(2):1–28.

Bhatt, Rajesh. 1999. Covert modality in non-finite contexts. University of Pennsylvania.

Bhatt, Rajesh and Romyana Pancheva. 2005. Conditionals. In M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk, eds., The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. 1, pages 638–687. Blackwell.

Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The Semantics of Modal Auxiliaries. In Croom Helm Linguistics Series. London: Croom Helm.

Condoravdi, Cleo. 2002. Temporal interpretation of modals: Modals for the present and for the past. In D. Beaver, S. Kaufmann, B. Clark, and L. Casillas, eds., The Construction of Meaning, pages 59–88. CSLI Publications.

Egan, Andy, John Hawthorne, and Brian Weatherson. 2005. Epistemic modals in context. In Contextualism in Philosophy, pages 131–168. Oxford University Press.

Hacquard, Valentine. 2006. Aspects of Modality. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Hacquard, Valentine and Alexis Wellwood. 2012. Embedding epistemic modals in English: A corpus-based study. Semantics and Pragmatics 5:1–29.

Iatridou, Sabine. 2000. The grammatical ingredients of counter factuality. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2):231–270.

Kratzer, Angelika. 1977. What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1:337–355.

Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. The notional category of modality. In H.-J. Eikmeyer and H. Rieser, eds., Words, Worlds and Contexts. Berlin: Berlin: de Gruyter.

Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. Modality. In A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich, eds., Semantik/Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: Berlin: de Gruyter.

Lassiter, Daniel. 2011. Measurement and Modality: The Scalar Basis of Modal Semantics. New York University.

Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Blackwell Publishers.

MacFarlane, John. 2011. Epistemic modality. In B.Weatherson and A. Egan, eds., Epistemic Modals are Assessment-Sensitive. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Romer, Ute. 2004. A corpus-driven approach to modal auxiliaries and their didactics. In J. Sinclair, ed., How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching, pages 185–199. John Benjamins.

Rubinstein, Aynat, Hllary Harner, Elizabeth Krawczyk, Daniel Simonson, Graham Katz, and Paul Portner. 2013. Toward fine-grained annotation of modality in text. Proceedings of IWCS 2013 Workshop on Annotation of

Modal Meanings in Natural Language (WAMM) .

Ruppenhofer, Josef and Ines Rehbein. 2012. Yes we can! annotating english modal verbs. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 1538–1545.

Schulz, Katrin. 2007. Minimal models in semantics and pragmatics: Free choice, exhaustivity, and conditionals. ILLC Dissertation Series


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.